Thursday, September 22, 2016

So What are the Greenhouse Gases...and What are NOT Greenhouse Gases



In my last post I talked about the greenhouse effect, which is a normal part of our atmosphere and the phenomenon that keeps the planet at a temperature that allows life as we know it. This is scientifically established, like gravity. Keep in mind that we are not talking about anything humans have done at this point, just what nature itself does. The greenhouse effect is basic physics. And it is natural.

Today I'll take a closer look at the gases that make up the atmosphere and which ones actually create the greenhouse effect. This seemed to be a sticking point for some folks who, whether intentionally or unintentionally, exhibited confusion over the basic atmospheric processes that make our planet livable.  

Take a look at the pie charts below.




As you can see in the top pie (purple, blue, and yellow circle), the dry atmosphere is about 78% nitrogen (N2), 21% oxygen (O2), and about 0.9% argon (Ar). In total, these three simple elements make up about 99.96% of all of the gases in the atmosphere. And their combined impact on the greenhouse effect is - drum roll please - zero, zilch, nada, nothing. Nitrogen and oxygen are not greenhouse gases and thus do not contribute to the greenhouse effect. 

Now look at the bottom pie above (the mostly light blue one).

Only about 0.04% of the atmosphere controls the temperature balance of the earth. And most of that 0.04% is carbon dioxide (CO2), which is indeed a greenhouse gas. Other greenhouse gases in trace amounts including methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and ozone (O3). Finally, you can add in water vapor (H2O), which is not included in the dry atmosphere totals above because it varies, but it on average is roughly 1% of the atmosphere.

So to reiterate, this approximately 0.04% of the atmosphere controls the entire natural greenhouse effect that keeps this planet at temperatures conducive to animal, plant, and human life as we know it.

But all greenhouse gases are not created equal. They vary in how efficient they are in absorbing long-wave radiation coming back up from the Earth. When you rank them based on their relative contribution to the greenhouse effect you get:
  1. water vapor
  2. carbon dioxide
  3. methane
  4. ozone
Oops. Isn't carbon dioxide (CO2) supposed to be THE most important greenhouse gas? Well, in a way it is, but it actually isn't the biggest contributor to the greenhouse effect. Water vapor actually generates more greenhouse effect than any other single gas. Estimates vary, but the combined effects of water, both as a gas (water vapor) and as a liquid (droplets in clouds), contributes between 66% and 85% of the greenhouse effect.

So why don't we talk more about water vapor? Well, besides some really technical stuff that I won't go into here, water vapor is naturally cycled into and out of the atmosphere on a relatively short time cycle (think, rain and snow). This means that while it has powerful short term impacts on temperature (a cloud passing in front of the sun will immediately make it feel cooler), water vapor is not a major driver of long-term climate change. It's more of a feedback, whereas CO2 is a forcing. (I'll talk about what that means in the next post) To find out more about the role of water vapor, check out this entertaining but informative video (notice the repeated cameo by Carl Sagan). For different reasons, ozone also has a pretty limited effect (and in fact actually contributes a small net cooling). Therefore, the concentrations of CO2 and methane are the main drivers of greenhouse gas induced climate change.

Remember, we have not said anything yet about human activity. Everything about the normal greenhouse effect is basic physics and natural. It is what keeps our planet "just right" (as opposed to too hot like Venus or too cold like Mars).

In the next post I'll go into more detail on CO2 and methane and their contributions to the greenhouse effect. I'll also look at why they are so important to future climate changes.



 [This is part of a series of posts explaining the basic science of climate change. More posts will be added weekly.]

Thursday, September 15, 2016

What is the Greenhouse Effect and what does it have to do with global warming?




Last week we took a look at some basic definitions needed to understand climate change (or global warming). This week we'll discuss the basic principles and history of the greenhouse effect, on the fundamental truths that explains why Earth has the global climate range is has. 

The greenhouse effect is pretty uncontroversial. It is basic physics. And it is why we can live on this planet.

In short, the greenhouse effect is the process by which light energy from the sun, upon passing through the atmosphere and reflecting off the earth, is partially blocked from leaving the atmosphere again. This is what warms the earth.

The basic principle is shown in the picture below.




In a nutshell, short-wave radiation from the sun passes through the Earth's atmosphere. That radiation is absorbed by the surface and reradiates back towards space, but now as longer wavelength Infrared (IR) energy. Some of this longer wavelength energy is absorbed by greenhouse gases (more on those later) and returned to the surface, thus warming the Earth.

For a quick primer about how the greenhouse effect works, check out this animated diagram.

If you want a little bit more detailed information, here is another good source.

And if you really want something to sink your teeth into, try this slightly more technical and expansive site.

One quick caveat. Though it's called the "greenhouse effect," actual greenhouses work slightly differently. The sun energy that comes into a greenhouse and reradiated is physically trapped by the glass. In the atmosphere the trapping is caused by the chemistry and physics of greenhouse gases. So the greenhouse effect is named more for its similar effect and not the actual mechanism. Don't let deniers confuse you on this simple difference.

As noted, this greenhouse effect is not controversial at all. It's well understood and has been demonstrated unequivocally to occur.



In fact, scientific understanding of the basic physics of the greenhouse effect has been building for over 200 years. Contrary to what some seem to think, the greenhouse effect was not invented by Al Gore in 2006 when his movie, An Inconvenient Truth, was released. It was first named in 1827 by Joseph Fourier, who was a mathematician in Napoleon's army.  [BTW, that's Fourier to the left...I included his picture because the poor guy never gets any credit]  In any case, Fourier came up with the idea that outgoing infrared energy would be blocked by gases in the atmosphere, more or less analogous to a pane of glass in a greenhouse. This built on the work of Sir William Herschel, who besides discovering the planet Uranus and writing symphonies had discovered in 1800 that energy can be transported by invisible infrared radiation.

In 1859 a British physicist named John Tyndall identified three main greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and water vapor (H2O). He discovered that these gases absorb light energy, convert it to heat, and reradiate the heat away as infrared light.

Then in 1896 a Swedish scientist named Svante Arrhenius (that's him, right) calculated that doubling the carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere would increase the temperature of the Earth by about 4-6°C on average (roughly 7-11°F). Despite having to make thousands of calculations by hand and the lack of measurement instruments at the time, Arrhenius's estimate is not too far off from the more up-to-date estimates of 2-4.5°C (about 3.6-8°F). This increase in global warming due to the doubling of CO2 has come to be known as "climate sensitivity," that is, how sensitive is climate to the increase in CO2 and other greenhouse gases. Still another guy, actually a dashing young Englishman named Guy, as in Guy Stewart Callendar, came around in 1938 to estimate this climate sensitivity to be about 2°C (about 3.6°F).

Wow, so it seems that the greenhouse effect is well known and built on knowledge that goes back to the work of scientists over two centuries ago. Knowledge that has expanded as technology has enhanced our ability to measure what we couldn't measure and calculate by computer what Arrhenius and others could do only by hand. It wasn't something Al Gore made up at all. There is, in fact, a whole body of science behind this simple concept.

Of course, we already knew that. Only deniers mention Al Gore in a sort of Pavlovian bell-ringing drool when they don't want to admit the long history of scientific understanding of the greenhouse effect. Actual climate scientists rely on over 100 years of peer-reviewed published scientific research papers (over 200 if you go back to Sir William Herschel's earliest discoveries).

As I noted at the beginning of this article, the greenhouse effect is why this planet supports life. Without it we would be like either Venus or Mars, either too hot or too cold. It is scientific fact that increasing greenhouse gases cause an increase in atmospheric temperature. Without this greenhouse effect, the surface temperature of the Earth would be much, much colder than it is! And that wouldn't be good at all, at least for us humans and most other plants and animals.

For those who are into the mathematical proofs of such things, you can read Proof of the Atmospheric Greenhouse Effect, a paper published in 2008 by physicist Arthur Smith.

So the greenhouse effect is natural and keeps us warm. The problem is that we've created an enhanced greenhouse effect by adding greenhouse gases to the atmosphere at an unprecedented rate, and that is causing the surface temperature to warm. That warming is causing all sorts of other climate problems as well, which we'll go into as this series continues.

That's enough for today. Take some time to become familiar with the general concept of the greenhouse effect. In future posts we'll take a look at the relative contributions of the various greenhouse gases, as well as other "forcings" that affect climate.

[This is part of a series of posts explaining the basic science of climate change. More posts will be added weekly.]