EPA Promotes Safer Alternatives to Nonylphenol Ethoxylates

According to the USEPA:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has released the final report on alternatives to nonylphenol ethoxylates (NPE) through the Design for the Environment (DfE) Alternatives Assessment Program. NPEs are widely used surfactants with a range of industrial applications and are commonly found in consumer products, such as laundry detergents. When released into the environment, they can be persistent and highly toxic to aquatic organisms. The report identifies eight safer alternatives to NPE that meet EPA’s criteria for safer surfactants.

“I applaud the product manufacturers who have stopped using NPEs and switched to safer alternatives and the chemical manufacturers who have made the safer alternatives available,” said Jim Jones, acting assistant administrator for EPA’s Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention (OCSPP). “This report shows the important strides that have been made to identify safer alternatives and the progress being made to phase out NPEs in detergents and reduce its use in other applications. By developing rigorous technical assessments through public participation, EPA can help successfully encourage the transition to safer chemicals.”  

The report provides information on the availability of safer alternatives, DfE’s hazard evaluation method for surfactants, and the progress being made in adopting safer surfactants.  Using rigorous hazard-based criteria, EPA evaluated hundreds of chemicals for their biodegradability and their potential effects to aquatic organisms.

DfE’s Alternatives Assessment Program helps industries choose safer chemicals and offers a basis for informed decision-making by providing a detailed comparison of the potential human health and environmental effects of chemical alternatives. To date, the DfE program has labeled more than 2,700 safer products, including detergents that contain only safer surfactants and other chemicals. All companies participating in the DfE Safer Detergents Stewardship Initiative have eliminated NPE from their product lines to meet DfE criteria.

More information on the DfE Alternatives Assessment Program and the NPEs Report:
http://www.epa.gov/dfe/pubs/projects/npe/index.htm

EPA Issues Design for the Environment Report on Li-ion Batteries and Nanotechnology

According to EPA:

EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics and Office of Research and Development (ORD) are pleased to announce that the draft final report for the life-cycle assessment (LCA) conducted by the Design for the Environment (DfE)/ORD Li-ion Batteries and Nanotechnology Partnership has been posted on EPA’s DfE Program web site for a 60-day public comment period, at http://epa.gov/dfe/pubs/projects/lbnp/index.htm.   The LCA results for advanced batteries used in plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles are expected to help promote the responsible development of these emerging energy systems, including nanotechnology innovations, leading to reduced overall environmental impacts and the reduced use and release of more toxic materials.  The LCA study identified key materials and processes within the batteries’ life cycles that are likely to pose the greatest environmental impacts, including occupational and public toxicity impacts, which will help the Li-ion battery industry to identify environmentally sound process, material, and design choices.  The partnership included battery manufacturers, suppliers, and recyclers, as well as representatives from academia, trade and research institutions, and the Department of Energy's Argonne National Laboratory.

 

For further information, please contact Kathy Hart in OPPT's DfE Program, at (202)564-8787, or by E-mail at: hart.kathy@epa.gov.

EPA Issues Huge Batch of SNURs - 119 Chemicals in All

In a direct final rule issued today, the USEPA has issued significant new use rules (SNURs) for 119 new chemical substances.  Four of the chemical substances are already "subject to TSCA consent orders issued by EPA."  According to the Federal Register notice, "this action requires persons who intend to manufacture, import, or process any of these 119 chemical substances for an activity that is designated as a significant new use by this rule to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing that activity. The required notification will provide EPA with the opportunity to evaluate the intended use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit that activity before it occurs."




While SNURs significantly restrict the ability for new companies to manufacture the substances - they are limited by the restrictions in the SNUR - they actually can provide a significant benefit to the original PMN submitter who already are being allowed to manufacture or import the substances listed. 


The four chemicals that are subject to consent orders are the only ones that are considered to be of significant risk, hence the consent order to control that risk. All four are perfluorinated substances.  The other 115 chemicals have more limited restrictions designed to ensure safe use.

The SNUR notice can be viewed in full here.

EPA's Lisa Jackson Names a New Science Advisor

On April 24th EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson officially appointed Glenn Paulson as Science Advisor in the Office of the Administrator.  Paulson fills the spot opened up with the resignation of Paul Anastas.  Lek Kadeli will continue to serve as acting assistant administrator in the Office of Research and Development.  According to Jackson:

Given the central place that science holds in the EPA’s decisions and actions, Dr. Paulson will play an important role in the work ahead. He brings with him years of experience in science and policy issues, extraordinary performance in multiple fields, and an unwavering dedication to the integrity that defines this agency's scientific work.

Paulson holds a PhD in environmental sciences and ecology from Rockefeller University.  Previously he has been an academic, was Director of the Center for Hazardous Waste Management at the Illinois Institute of Technology, served as Associate Dean for Research in the School of Public Health and as Director of the New Jersey Center for Public Health Preparedness at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey.  He has also founded his own environmental and energy consulting firm, and served as assistant commissioner for science at the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, was Director of the Scientific Support Program for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), and was a Senior Vice President at the
National Audubon Society.

The NRDC praised the selection of Paulson:

“Glenn Paulson will bring to EPA a lifelong commitment to the integrity of science when it comes to making the best decisions to protect our air, water, lands, wildlife and our health. His dedication and collegiality will serve him and the country well.”

ECHA to publish total tonnage band for registered substances

ECHA has taken a decision on the method by which it will calculate the total tonnage bands for substances on ECHA's registered substances database. The total tonnage bands for registered substances will be published on the ECHA website during June 2012.

More information in the ECHA press release.

ECHA launches public consultations on two proposals for harmonised classification and labelling

ECHA, the European Chemicals Agency responsible for the evaluation of chemicals under the REACH program, has opened a public consultation on proposals to harmonize classification of two substances.  According to their news release:

ECHA  invites the parties concerned to comment on two new proposals for harmonised classification and labelling (CLH): Fenoxaprop-P-ethyl and 8:2 Fluorotelomer alcohol (8:2 FTOH). The public consultation will be open for 45 days and will end on 1 June 2012. The CLH reports and the dedicated webform to post the comments are available on the ECHA website.

ECHA's Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) will consider the comments received during the public consultation when developing its opinion on the CLH proposal. The Commission takes into account the RAC opinion when it decides whether the proposal for harmonised classification and labelling is accepted and if so, the substance is added to the list of hazardous substances for which harmonised classification and labelling has been established (Annex VI, part 3 of the CLP Regulation).

More information can be found on the ECHA site.

EPA Proposes Rule to Require Electronic Reporting for Chemical Information

From EPA:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced a proposed rule to require electronic reporting for certain information submitted to the agency under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).The action is an important milestone in the agency’s effort to increase transparency and public access to chemical information in order to help Americans protect their health and environment. Electronic reporting will increase the speed with which EPA can make information publicly available, increase accuracy, and provide the public with quick and easier access to chemical information. 

More in the press release.

Prepublication PDF here.

ECHA to Update REACH-IT and IUCLID 5 Software for REACH Chemical Assessments

According to an ECHA press release:

The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) is going to release a new version of IUCLID 5 in late May 2012 and subsequently a new release of REACH-IT. Later this year, ECHA will start publishing more information on chemical substances.

Helsinki, 11 April 2012 - The new IUCLID 5.4 release will bring about changes mainly on how certain substance information included in the Chemical Safety Report (CSR) is reported. In addition, certain information included in the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) will be made publicly available. As a continuation of the IUCLID 5 update, a new version of REACH-IT will be released later in the summer. The new REACH-IT release will accept only IUCLID 5.4 dossiers. ECHA publishes a Question and Answer (Q&A) document to inform stakeholders in advance about the impact on the upcoming submissions of registration and other dossiers.

More information

ECHA Updates REACH Guidance on Data Sharing for Chemical Regulation

The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) has updated its guidance on data sharing.  The update takes into consideration information and experience obtained during the REACH registration process and since the original publication of the guidance in 2007.

According to ECHA,"the text has been throroughly revised amending both content and structure." Changes to content include improvement of the "overall coherence" and to create a more focused document that helps companies avoid "unnecessary testing." Duplicative material covered in other guidance has been removed and/or made more consistent.  Two new sections have been added to make the document clearer, including more comprehensive discussions of the data sharing process for phase-in and non-phase-in substances. Additional new sections cover the "data sharing dispute processes" and "post-registration data sharing obligations."

More information can be found on the ECHA site.

EPA to Decommission Important Chemical Identification Tool Due to Lack of Funding

The USEPA has announced that it will soon decommission an important chemical identification tool "due to lack of funding support." The Analog Identification Methodology (AIM) tool was "designed to help identify publicly available, experimental toxicity data on closely related chemical structures."  Once decommissioned, AIM will no longer be available on EPA's website.  Funding to EPA has been severely cut by Congress 9with threats of even more cuts) for a variety of programs designed to protect health and safety of humans and the environment. 

AIM has been a valuable tool for industry to identify chemicals that are similar to the ones for which they are filing PreManufacture Notices (PMN).  PMNs are filed prior to putting a new chemical on the market.  Without the AIM tool industry will have less certainty as to whether they have provided the proper information to ensure an efficient approval process.  Under TSCA, EPA has 90 days to inform industry if their PMN raises concerns for the new chemical; without concerns being raised the submitter is allowed to put the chemical into production after the 90 days.  Without use of AIM as a screening tool there is a potential for more concerns to be raised in order to give more time to review the PMN.

EPA is asking all those in industry, NGOs, and consultants who use the AIM tool to email coordinator Kelly Mayo-Bean (mayo.kelly@epa.gov) with a note indicating their use of the the tool and its importance in their work.  Ms. Mayo-Bean will compile comments and provide to management in hopes of having the funding and tool reinstated in the future.

Canada Confirms Order Designating Four Chemicals as CEPA Toxic

Canada has published an "Order Adding Toxic Substances to Schedule 1 of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999." The order confirms the CEPA toxic designation of four chemicals, thus allowing for Canada to regulate them.  The four chemicals are:

• Propane, 2-nitro- (Chemical Abstracts Service [CAS] (see footnote 2) Registry No. 79-46-9), hereafter referred to as “2-nitropropane”; 

• Benzene, 1-methyl-2-nitro- (CAS No. 88-72-2), hereafter referred to as “2-nitrotoluene”;

• Phenol, 2,6-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-(1-methylpropyl)- (CAS No. 17540-75-9), hereafter referred to as “DTBSBP”; and

• Methylium, [4-(dimethylamino)phenyl]bis[4-(ethylamino)-3-methylphenyl]-, acetate (CAS No. 72102-55-7), hereafter referred to as “MAPBAP acetate.”

Draft regulations have been proposed for at least one of the chemicals.  According to the Canada Gazette:

The Order adds the four above-mentioned substances to Schedule 1 to CEPA 1999, thereby allowing the Ministers to meet their obligation to publish proposed regulations or other instruments no later than July 31, 2012, and finalize them no later than January 31, 2014. Developing an implementation plan or a compliance strategy or establishing service standards are not considered necessary if no specific risk management proposals are made. An appropriate assessment of implementation, compliance and enforcement will be undertaken during the development of proposed regulations or control instrument(s) respecting preventive or control actions for these substances.  

More information can be found in the Canada Gazette notice.

EPA Proposes New Rules to Limit New Uses of Potentially Harmful Chemicals

Yesterday the USEPA "proposed that companies be required to report to EPA all new uses, including in domestic or imported products, of five groups of potentially harmful chemicals." These Significant New Use Rules - SNURS - were identified in action plans for five chemicals issued over the last two years. The chemicals include uses "in a range of consumer products and industrial applications, including paints, printing inks, pigments and dyes in textiles, flame retardants in flexible foams, and plasticizers.".

The five chemicals EPA targets, as noted in their press release, are "polybrominated diphenylethers (PBDEs), benzidine dyes, a short chain chlorinated paraffin, hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD), and phthalate di-n-pentyl phthalate (DnPP). The agency is also proposing additional testing on the health and environmental effects of PBDEs."

“Although a number of these chemicals are no longer manufactured or used in the U.S. they can still be imported in consumer goods or for use in products. Today’s proposed actions will ensure that EPA has an opportunity to review new uses of the chemicals, whether they are domestically produced or imported, and if warranted, take action to prohibit or limit the activity before human health or environmental effects can occur,” said Jim Jones, EPA’s acting assistant administrator for the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. “These actions also signal EPA’s ongoing commitment to the American people that the agency is taking significant steps to make sure that the chemicals manufactured and used in this country are safe.”

More information on the SNURS can be found at the EPA web site.

Just a few weeks ago EPA also released a set of documents in their Chemical Work Plan for prioritizing and conducting risk assessments. 

ECHA QSAR Toolbox version 2.3 now available for REACH

ECHA has announced the release of the newest version (Version 2.3) of the OECD QSAR Toolbox for use in REACH and other regulatory actions.  According to their press release, "the software helps registrants and authorities to use Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship ((Q)SAR) methodologies to group chemicals into categories and to fill data gaps by read-across, trend analysis and to assess the (eco)toxicity hazards of chemicals under REACH. This helps to reduce costs and unnecessary testing on vertebrate animals."

While many chemicals do have existing or new data to meet many endpoints, they often have data gaps.  QSARs can be used both to meet some data requirements and provide an estimate of certain properties that allows decision-making on whether new testing is needed.

For more information see here.

The QSAR Toolbox and guidance documents can be downloaded here.

REACH Won't Work for TSCA Reform, Says Industry Based on Indiana Report

The US chemical industry is pointing to a new academic report as proof that the European REACH chemical management system is not a good fit for implementing in the US.  The report from Indiana University comes while Congress has effectively punted on pursuing reform of the 35 year old Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). 

The full report, for preparation of which the authors acknowledge receiving "unrestricted financial support from the American Chemistry Council, Dow, and DuPont," presents information about REACH and offers the following five findings:


FINDING #1: U.S. Policymakers Should Consider Simplifications of the REACH program.

FINDING #2: If a REACH-like system is adopted in the United States, more public disclosure of safety-related information and opportunities for public participation should be provided.

FINDING #3: In considering how to streamline REACH for application in the United States, more focus should be on priority-setting based on risk and the opportunity to reduce risks to human health and the environment.

FINDING #4: Since some of the frustration and burden in the early years of REACH implementation has been linked to ambiguity in program design, a REACH-like system in the United States should provide clarification about critical standards, processes, and tools.

FINDING #5: If the United States chooses to adopt a REACH-like system of registration, unnecessary burdens on industry can be lessened by allowing for mutual, cross-Atlantic recognition of registration dossiers.

The full report can be downloaded as a PDF file here.