ECHA Issues 2012 Work Program - Sees Challenges Ahead

The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) approved its 2012 work program last week and highlighted both its activities and its challenges ahead of the next REACH deadline.  Besides the mid 2013 REACH registration deadline, ECHA will take on an expanding role in the new Biocidal Products Regulation (which will replace the current Directive in 2013). In addition, ECHA will have ramped up activities related to other parts of the expansive REACH regulation, including the Evaluation (the "E") and Authorization (the "A") components, as well as Restrictions (the "missing R").  And of course there is still the continuing evaluation of substance dossiers for high productive volume chemicals submitted in the first registration period that ended on November 30, 2010.

All of this leaves ECHA worried that there may not be enough resources to meet obligations efficiently, both within ECHA and in the Member States.  The current economic situation in most of Europe, which has caused such severe spending cuts (austerity), has led ECHA Executive Director Geert Dancet to openly state his concerns that Member States may not have enough resources to fully conduct their role in chemical evaluation.

The developing Biocidal Products Regulation (BPR) also offers challenges to ECHA as the agency is expected to take on responsibility for authorizing biocides.  Under the current biocides directive this responsibility lies with each Member State.  ECHA would also take on new responsibilities related to the Prior Informed Consent Regulation, which involves identifying hazardous chemicals that could not be exported from Europe unless the country of destination is given sufficient information to assess risk.

During the September 29-30, 2011 meeting of the management board, the mandate of the Executive Director was extended.  According to the chairman, Dr. Thomas Jakl:

"After the first REACH registration deadline was impressively managed by ECHA in 2010, there is no time to rest on our laurels. Challenging further steps of the REACH and CLP implementation lie ahead and the legislator is in the process of entrusting important new regulatory tasks to the Agency. The continuation decision with regard to a selection process for the Executive Director reflects the high satisfaction of the Board with his achievements since 2007."

More information and a link to the work program can be found on the ECHA web site.

EU Adds Five Pesticides to PIC, Japan Considers Three More Chemicals for Prior Informed Consent

The European Union (EU) voted last week to add five new pesticides to the Prior Informed Consent (PIC) list under the Rotterdam Convention.  Meanwhile, Japan is considering the addition of three other pesticides to the PIC list.  The Rotterdam Convention stipulates that "severely hazardous pesticide formulations that present a hazard under conditions of use in developing countries or countries with economies in transition may also be nominated for inclusion in Annex III." Once listed a "decision guidance document" must be prepared that defines how the chemical will be banned or severely restricted.

The five pesticides added to the PIC list by the EU are guazatine, indolylactic acid, 1,3-dichloropropene, ethalfluralin, and thiobencarb.  Beginning on October 1st of this year these pesticides will be restricted for export to developing countries, i.e., the countries must be informed of the hazards prior to the sale and use in that country.  Meanwhile, last week also saw Japan propose to add alachlor (a herbicide) and aldicarb and endosulfan (both insecticides) to the PIC list.  Japan currently has restrictions on use and export of 36 chemicals under the Rotterdam Convention treaty.

The EU action followed on a decision not to include the five pesticides on the EU list of approved pesticides, which means they will be effectively banned from use in the EU.  This action was taken because no manufacturer successfully applied for continued authorization of these chemicals.

More information on the additions to the PIC list can be found in the Official Journal of the European Union or on the Rotterdam Convention home page.

UPDATE - Only 3 of the 4 chemicals added to Rotterdam Convention PIC list

Last week I reported that the parties to the Rotterdam Convention were in discussion to add four chemical substances to the Prior Informed Consent (PIC) list.  The four substances were chrysotile asbestos, endosulfan, alachlor and aldicarb.  Well, now that the Fifth Conference of the Parties is over, they decided only to list three of the four.  Parties could not reach a consensus on the addition of chrysotile asbestos due to opposition from several countries, led by Canada and later joined by Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Peru and the Ukraine.

Agreement to list the herbicide alachlor and the insecticide aldicarb was reached quickly.  The addition of endosulfan was a bit more contentious because Cuba had argued that listing would cause significant implementation problems for developing countries.  After promises were made to provide technical and financial guidance the agreement to list endosulfan was reached.


These three chemicals will be added to Annex III to the Convention.  Further discussion on chrysotile asbestos will no doubt occur in future meetings of the parties. 

More information on Rotterdam and Prior Informed Consent can be found here.

Four chemicals to be added to the Rotterdam Convention PIC list?

The fifth meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP5) to the Rotterdam Convention starts today and will continue through Friday, June 24, 2011 in Geneva Switzerland.  On the agenda are decisions regarding the inclusion of four substances to the Prior Informed Consent (PIC) list. The four substances are chrysotile asbestos, endosulfan, alachlor and aldicarb.  If the decision is inclusion, the chemicals will be added to Annex III to the Convention.

The participants of COP5 also hope to adopt a strategic plan related to management of industrial chemicals worldwide, with emphasis on "synergies between the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal, the Rotterdam Convention and the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants." 

Alachlor and aldicarb are expected to be approved for PIC listing, while chrysotile asbestos and endosulfan may garner significant additional discussion as several participating countries have expressed their concerns based on economic reasons, i.e., that PIC listing is equivalent to blacklisting the chemicals from the market.

More information on the Rotterdam Convention and Prior Informed Consent can be found here and here.