A new poll conducted by Public Opinion Strategies, a leading Republican polling firm, shows that "voters are concerned about the effects of exposure to toxic chemicals in day to day life." The poll also shows that "most voters support 'stricter regulation of chemicals produced and used in everyday products.'"
POS conducted the national telephone survey of 800 registered voters on June 25-27, 2012. The overall margin of error is +3.46%. Interviews were distributed proportionally throughout the country. More information on the poll results and methods can be found here.
Poll results show that 77% of respondents support specific legislation to reform the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), the law passed in 1976 for which all stakeholders (industry, NGOs, EPA, health and environmental advocates) agree needs to be modernized. Support for reform of the law was "wide-spread and broad-based," i.e., large majorities of all demographics surveyed agreed that the law was in need of updating.
POS concluded that "U.S. voters overwhelmingly support reform to regulations overseeing chemicals produced and used in everyday products, particularly when provided with specifics about what the reform might entail." Even when robust arguments on both sides of the issue were presented, "voters continue to side with supporters of reform."
TSCA reform has been the subject of many attempts by Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) and others to introduce legislation. Lautenberg's most recent effort, the Safe Chemicals Act, has languished in Committee without action. This might change this week, however, as Lautenberg says he expects to bring the bill to markup this week, which may lead to a Committee vote as early as Wednesday.
Meanwhile, the subcommittee and full committee of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has scheduled a hearing for Tuesday, July 24th to discuss Congressional oversight of EPA authorities related to TSCA. Of specific interest is a recent investigative series by the Chicago Tribune that suggested the brominated flame retardant industry had overstated benefits and understated risks of a class of flame retardants called PBDEs. This builds on a hearing held recently by Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL).
Science, policy, and politics. Focus on science communication and climate change. The Dake Page offers news, analysis and book reviews.
Showing posts with label Durbin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Durbin. Show all posts
Monday, July 23, 2012
Wednesday, July 18, 2012
Senator Durbin Holds Hearing on Brominated Flame Retardants
Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) held a hearing on Tuesday, July 17, 2012 regarding the question:
AreConsumers Adequately Protected from Flammability of Upholstered Furniture? Hearing on the Effectiveness of FurnitureFlammability Standards and Flame Retardant Chemicals.
Durbin's concern stems from a recent Chicago Tribune investigative series that suggested the flame retardant industry had misled regulators on both the effectiveness and safety of a class of brominated flame retardants called PBDEs. The Senator is a strong supporter of overhauling the 26-year old TSCA law and is a co-sponsor of the Safe Chemicals Act introduced by Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ).
Scheduled witnesses at the July 17th hearing were:
More information on the hearing can be found here.
AreConsumers Adequately Protected from Flammability of Upholstered Furniture? Hearing on the Effectiveness of FurnitureFlammability Standards and Flame Retardant Chemicals.
Durbin's concern stems from a recent Chicago Tribune investigative series that suggested the flame retardant industry had misled regulators on both the effectiveness and safety of a class of brominated flame retardants called PBDEs. The Senator is a strong supporter of overhauling the 26-year old TSCA law and is a co-sponsor of the Safe Chemicals Act introduced by Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ).
Scheduled witnesses at the July 17th hearing were:
Panel I
·
The
Honorable Inez Tenenbaum, Chairman, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
·
James J.
Jones, Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution
Prevention, Environmental Protection Agency.
Panel II
·
August
(Gus) Schaefer, Sr., Vice President and Chief Safety Officer, Underwriters
Laboratories, Inc.
·
Andy
Counts, CEO, American Home Furnishings Alliance.
·
Peter
Van Dorpe, Chief of the Training Division for Chicago Fire Department.More information on the hearing can be found here.
Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Senator Durbin Calls for Passage of Safe Chemicals Act
Illinois Senator Dick Durbin has called upon his colleagues to pass the Safe Chemicals Act, "which
would update and modernize the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976." Durbin calls the 36 year old law “antiquated and ineffective” and desperately in need of reform. TSCA governs the regulation of chemicals in the United States with the goal of protecting human health and the environment.
On his web page Durbin notes that:
The Chicago Tribune series he mentions refers to an investigative journalism series published this month that "uncovered flawed testing, products that don’t work, unscrupulous “experts,” shoddy science and stalled government reform." The reporting focused on
The Safe Chemicals Act bill was introduced by Senator Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey in April 2011 and remains in limbo with no action. The last hearing was held in November 2011 and expectations are low that it will be taken up for a vote in this election year. Even if the bill was passed in the Democratically-held Senate there is virtually no chance the Republican House would consider further regulation. With the potential for the Republican's to gain control of the Senate in addition to holding the House in the fall, it seems unlikely that TSCA reform has much chance of seeing the light of day for many years, if ever.
Senator Durbin's full press release is available here.
The Chicago Tribune series can be found here.
A statement from the NGO Safer Chemicals Healthy Families can be read here.
A related statement from the American Chemistry Council can be read here.
On his web page Durbin notes that:
“The U.S. EPA, wittingly or unwittingly, has allowed the manufacturers of toxic chemicals to flood American households with substances that abundant scientific evidence finds harmful. The Chicago Tribune series published this week reveals that flame retardant chemicals added to furniture and other household goods are not only useless, but also toxic for our families – especially young children. The disturbing truth is that flame retardants are only one example of the many toxic substances that have made their way into American homes as a result of self-serving chemical companies and the weak, ineffective federal law that has regulated chemical safety standards since 1976. We have to come together on a bipartisan basis to pass the Safe Chemicals Act and provide Illinois families with the basic level of safety they expect.”
The Chicago Tribune series he mentions refers to an investigative journalism series published this month that "uncovered flawed testing, products that don’t work, unscrupulous “experts,” shoddy science and stalled government reform." The reporting focused on
The Safe Chemicals Act bill was introduced by Senator Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey in April 2011 and remains in limbo with no action. The last hearing was held in November 2011 and expectations are low that it will be taken up for a vote in this election year. Even if the bill was passed in the Democratically-held Senate there is virtually no chance the Republican House would consider further regulation. With the potential for the Republican's to gain control of the Senate in addition to holding the House in the fall, it seems unlikely that TSCA reform has much chance of seeing the light of day for many years, if ever.
Senator Durbin's full press release is available here.
The Chicago Tribune series can be found here.
A statement from the NGO Safer Chemicals Healthy Families can be read here.
A related statement from the American Chemistry Council can be read here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


